Four decades after their descent the detonator on the nation, the defeat of June of 1967 was still casting their dark shadows over the Palestinian people and on the Arab World, and the history of region and world entirely. Regardless of the names, and presenting the secondary question to what that that lost in them the armies of three Arab countries in front of Israel, reached is considered a defeat or that it was just a setback, what happened have left dug its clear prints and its shaking effects in the memory of this generation and in the depth of history, along the forty last years, it is a defeat if we look into its extended deep effects in time and place, and she is a setback if we look at from the angle of what we witnessed, in the beginning, from the level of ambition and work on its surpassing, which is the matter that did not happen after wars and other defeats the Arab history witnessed them since then and until now. The attracting phenomenon that appeared in the context of the work on surpassing that setback or the defeat, spread of an intellectual and political state remained aspiring to holding a complete review at all levels, the military and political and economic and the social and cultural, and the presentation of the essential and detailed questions related to what happened, and reasons are what happened, and the search for the disaster surpassing ways that befell the nation. It has spread on the intellectual level and the ideological, and the political thought especially, a health phenomenon, consisted in the attempts of standing by cognitive fossils for the arrival at the deeper and farther causes for the defeat, and different intellectual movements were prominent that did not hesitate in the adoption of contradictory references from the political thought, national and leftist ..and other, shot a force from the serious diligence, associated with the condition of the popular movement. The attracting and more phenomenon was an emergence in the self-criticism operation on the level of the political responsibility, embarking president Gamal Abd An-Nasir himself on the adoption of the recognition culture, after the war results became clear clearly, the Arab leader did not hesitate from the appearance publicly in front of his people and the peoples the Arab that believed in his command, and the advertisement are directly his bearing the responsibility whole about the setback that happened, and offering its resignation to the people, and the return to the publics lines, that were its fast and direct reaction, going to the street for the expression of its refusal the defeat and the refusal of resignation. As we recognize here, that Abd Al-Nasser is the only Arab leader, perhaps throughout the Arab history the long, the one that exercised the recognition culture with courage, and he declared his resignation from his site and the return to the publics lines, the phenomenon that did not recur thereafter, despite the setbacks, the defeats and the failures that we witnessed along the four decades passed on the that day. The question has been the raised basis then, focuses about whether she was the war result she is a defeat of the Arab regime that it went through without getting ready to it sufficiently and serious, militarily and politically and economically and culturally, Or that it was the defeat of the Arab peoples also!? Does the defeat of armies or that they are the defeat of the Arab will! Did the disastrous result come for the war according to a weakness in the military force and a decrease in the armament, a corruption and the flabbiness of leaders in the military establishment, or for the badness of accounts and estimations to the ruling Arab political classes!? Did the defeat come away from the absence of democracy about the authoritative formation of the Arab rule systems, and the grave violation of the freedoms, and from it the freedom of the parties formation, and the fair election exercise, and the freedom of saying and writing and the expression!? Do the Arab - Arab disagreements between what was shooting at it the progressive and other preserving countries or the reaction in another naming, she is the setback reason, that reached their limit in the condition of the political attraction that the arena witnessed between the big Arab axes, and hence an occupation and the involvement of the biggest Arab military force, and we mean Egypt, in a secondary war in Yemen, leaving for the Israeli army an opportunity for building and the development of its military structure without a serious threat, or that the disorder was lying in a nature, the ruling class son in the most effect Arab countries and an effectiveness. Was the defeat military, or a political, or that it, in its advanced condition, was a defeat of a bourgeois authoritative intellectual composition a small, as he came in some leftist thought analyses then, the class is the class that turns due to its formation about the possession of view and the radical exercise, that adopted, on the realistic level, a kind of the socialist belief moderate, gelatinous. Was the defeat a passing event in the history and isolated about what except, or that it was part of the wide historic Zionist project and a fierce ring in series its rings for achieving the Zionist dream, not with the establishment of a Jewish national homeland only, but also the achievement of a wider dream, consists in a dominant regional imperial strength residence and armed with the weapon!? Whatever and regardless of the political intellectual storming condition that the Arab arena witnessed along the Arab World, and the difference of the serious diligence in the way of reasons understanding and factors are what ran and its surpassing ways, the most prominent response is on those questions, and other, came realistically, and consisted in the emergence of the Palestinian resistance movement, with the command of a Palestinian National Liberation Movement Fatah and its appearance to the publicity and with an attracting public extension on the land, after it made some years in the shadow or underground. The Arab leader Jamal Abd An-Nasir has recognized the great historic importance therefore the response, the military one and the violent the popular political on the defeat with his saying: the Fatah Movement is the noblest phenomenon that appeared on the Arab land after June 1967, and she was found so that she remains, and added to it the martyr leader Yasser Arafat blessings were found so that remains and triumphs. As it was for the unity of blood that consisted in the clash of the Jordanian soldier and the Palestinian fedayee (fighters) on the land of dignity, political and military meanings, in addition to the important psychological value that the fighter, the soldier and the Arab, who consisted in a moral restoration was needing it he is not underestimated its value, for the lost Arab dignity in June 1967. The brave Nasserist decision with the engagement of war of attrition has represented, very influential a military political and moral response in its time, and a prepared the jump is not possible for its role in the decision of Suez Canal crossing, and in the military victory that materialized in the war of October of 1973. The war of attrition has represented a practical translation of the Arab slogan that the summit of Khartoum Arab that convened after the war of June raised 1967 directly: no reconciliation .. No recognition ..No negotiations, and its positive prints left in the psychological structure to the fighter and in the Arab feeling, as this war contributed to the rehabilitation for the latent Arab abilities. All that, does not deny that forty year of the disastrous results is for the war, that Israel called them the Six Day War, so that ascends after them in the seventh day the region throne, as came in the religious mythology has dug big and great negative effects in the new Arab history, and they contributed to the devotion of the Israeli entity as a regional power and in the leakage of concepts and new political and geography events. Since then, the expression of Middle East crisis started permeating gradually the thought and the political work related to the conflict, so that he dissolves the Palestinian cause expression place. Despite the Israeli achievements on this level, the increasing role is for the Palestinian struggle, in response to the defeat and refusal to it, and the increase of the effective efficiency of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, the one that seized in the middle of the seventies from the twentieth century, an Arab and international recognition the quality of the legitimate and only representative of the Palestinian people succeeded in the confirmation of the centralism of issue, and the devotion of the armed struggle and the adherence to it as a more elevated form of the other struggle forms, with sticking to the Palestinian refugees right in the return to their cities, their villages and their houses that left in 1948 in a non moral ethnic cleansing operation that the Zionist gangs exercised, the one that committed through it not a massacre its truths are still appearing day after day. The Palestinian rifle has passed, then, without surpassing or the issue's forgetfulness of the basis, that are summarized by the right of the Palestinian people with the liberation, the independence and the return to the houses and the raised Nasserist slogan was then, the one that repeats that what was taken with the strength is not restored without the strength, a bond and leaning for the Palestinian fedayee (fighters) that remained meeting a support and an Arab, official aid and popular without borders, and harmonizes with an Arab policy that was calling for the removal of the disastrous results for that war, and represents at the same time a practical refusal of the defeat. Despite that, Israel did not stop a moment, since then and until now, about the investment of its military victory in June 1967 and in its following wars, and all of the battles, and until the peace battles that it went through its interest. With the Israeli celebrations of the 40th anniversary shot at it the falsehood of the unification of Jerusalem, any inclusion of its eastern department with the strength, and he is what means the attempt of the establishment of the complete occupation of the Holy City by both its eastern and western departments. That associates with the 40th anniversary for the aggressive war that led to the fall of what remained of a Palestinian land, is to areas side it is not underestimated it from the Arab land, with these celebrations, Israel continues ahead its flagrant violations, not concerned about the international community attitude that does not recognize the measures of Annex and the Judaization. Despite the American and European absence about those Israeli celebrations the fabricated and not legitimate, the one that started at the middle of last may, that the last year of its sixth contract associated with the entrance of disaster of 48, and the repetition of the European Union of its tentative situation that the recognition of the unified Jerusalem refuses a capital of Israel, to the conviction side that the occupation of Israel of the eastern part from Jerusalem is integral part of the Palestinian territories. The real demographic disorder does not come from the natural increases to the Arab citizens in Jerusalem, but it comes due to the occupation policies above-mentioned, the one that confiscates from the city peoples their right in the citizenship, and the living with dignity on their land that the confiscation projects and the ghoul of the colonial settlement threaten, where they come by the strangers from the world regions so that they settle in Jerusalem just for their being Jews they possess, an injustice, such right is !? Israel has allocated millions of dollars yearly, with the target of an establishment and the consolidation of the aggressive settlement Israeli control on the occupied East Jerusalem in June 1967, and the translation of its plans aiming to the execution of more of the Judaization projects to the city, that their Arab and Islamic features started dissolving in front of eyes that became incapable until about shedding the tears, a sadness and a regret. After forty years, we stand so that we contemplate the Arab condition, then our sights collide with a scene that raises the grief, by all its dimensions and its details. In spite of the eloquent lessons that the war of July of 2006 offered and the Lebanese fighter prioritized it over the south land, and in its introduction the confirmation of the capabilities of confrontation and resistance and until the reach of victory, the submissiveness life is still casting its shadows over the extended area from ocean to Gulf and from it to big areas from the Islamic world. On the opposite side to the measures that devote to the occupation is in the bank, Gaza and Jerusalem, there a terrible Arab and Islamic silence, as an expression of a condition from the inability the incurable. If the defeat of June has given birth to the noblest phenomenon that the Arab arena witnessed, the 40th anniversary for an occupation not has remained of Palestine and of the eastern part from Jerusalem that comes in a situation he is the worst of what the Palestinian condition reached from deteriorations and tragic collapses. The conflict over the authority reached its maximum limits that weakened the noble image to the Palestinian fighter that as long as he went through his battles for the freedom, the liberation and the return. We have watched, and is still we, how the weapon holders became directing their weapons to issuing the each others, under a condition that witnesses a grave retreat for will the Palestinian fighters (fedayee) fighter that our national struggle course knew. Along the four last decades, so that they dwell in their place, the operations of internal fight reached from the cruelty an unprecedented limit it and not preceded which isolates the publics from their striving role through the creation of an imaginary substitute for its required historic doing, and it grants the attacking, killing party, at the same time, a free political and media weapon it reinforces through it its sites on the international level, and the appearance as a victim is from the terrorism victims! We do not discuss on the anniversary of forty wars of June from means for the consolidation of defeat and their establishment so that they manage in the end the resistance life in us. What happens in Gaza from an internal fighting and a cancellation of doing the real resistance. Let the memory of setback or the defeat, an opportunity of the self-criticism before the other money. Israel continues its aggression on the Palestinian territories while we suffer from a non preceded condition from the disintegration and the loss of compass, and is what grants its aggressive plans a climate suitable for more aggression, and the renewal of defeat. So that the occasion bears an opportunity so that we become silent and on a wide level, the gates of the agreement on the way of the conflict management with the occupation and the expansionist policies of Israel, and by renewed, effective styles. The resistance right principle that any misleading talk that tries its putting in the terrorism digit does not drop, and he a legitimate right it guarantees it to us all of the laws, the international laws and the axioms of human rights and the rights of freedom and dignity. The arrival at Palestinian agreements is around the resistance styles, without a party monopolizing from the parties supposing its unilateral view for the way of the conflict management, does not complete by the complete and continuous national dialogue and with achievement that we can say we became prepared for the defeat of defeat. Ahmad Qurae’ (Abu ‘Ala) 5/6/2007